Skip to main content

Introduction to the Controversy

The Washington Post’s Tuesday edition was set to feature a clear message: "Fire Elon Musk." This was to be delivered through an ad placement bought by two advocacy groups, which would have wrapped the entire paper with the call for Musk’s removal. However, according to one of the groups involved, the Post backed out of the agreement, stating it would not run the message on the outside of the paper.

The Ad Placement Agreement

Common Cause, a nonprofit watchdog organization, had teamed up with the Southern Poverty Law Center Action Fund to purchase the ad. They claimed to have signed a $115,000 agreement with the Post to have full-cover messages on the front and back of the Washington Post’s Tuesday issue, along with a full-page ad inside the paper. These ads were intended to reach individuals working at Congress, the Pentagon, and the White House.

Twitter Reaction

A tweet from Matthew Cortland highlighted the Post’s decision, stating, "WaPo — a once great paper — is now a billionaire’s kiss-fascist-ass project." This reaction reflects the public’s perception of the Post’s decision and its potential implications.

The Proposed Ad Content

The groups submitted their desired messaging, but the Post refused to run it on the outer wraps, although the ad inside the paper was allowed to stay. The proposed cover image featured Elon Musk overshadowing the White House with the message, "Who’s running this country: Donald Trump or Elon Musk?" The back of the paper would have shown another image of Musk with the statement, "No one elected Elon Musk to any office."

The "Fire Elon Musk" Campaign

This ad was part of the ongoing "Fire Elon Musk" campaign by Common Cause, the Southern Poverty Law Center Action Fund, and End Citizens United. The campaign has set up the website FireMusk.org to encourage citizens to take action against Musk’s unelected role in government. Common Cause reported that it has already gathered 60,000 signatures on a petition objecting to Musk’s position.

Potential Conflict of Interest

It’s worth noting that Post owner Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk have recently been on good terms. They appeared together at Donald Trump’s inauguration and exchanged pleasantries on Twitter. Bezos has also made efforts to build relationships with Donald Trump, offering congratulations after his election win and having dinner together at Mar-a-Lago. Additionally, Amazon, which Bezos founded, donated $1 million, and Melania Trump is set to earn at least $28 million from an Amazon deal.

Conclusion

The Washington Post’s decision to back out of the ad placement agreement has raised questions about potential conflicts of interest and the influence of billionaires on media outlets. The Post’s slogan, "Democracy dies in darkness," takes on a new light in this context, leaving one to wonder if this is a case of democracy being influenced by the interests of the wealthy.


Source Link