Skip to main content

Social Media Startup Sues Instacart and Partiful for Trademark Infringement

Introduction to the Lawsuit

Social media startup Fizz has taken legal action against grocery delivery giant Instacart and party planning app Partiful, accusing them of trademark infringement. The lawsuit follows Instacart’s launch of a new drinks and snack delivery app for parties, also called Fizz, which has been integrated into Partiful’s platform.

Background on Fizz

Fizz is a social networking app that focuses on the Gen Z demographic and is available on over 400 college campuses. The company was founded in 2020 and has been using the "FIZZ" trademark since January 2022, with a trademark registration filing in December 2021.

Details of the Lawsuit

The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, seeks a jury trial, injunctive relief, damages, and a court order barring Instacart and Partiful from using the "FIZZ" name in connection with social or event planning services. Fizz alleges common law trademark infringement, federal trademark infringement, cybersquatting, and violations of California’s unfair competition laws.

Response from Instacart and Partiful

Instacart and Partiful have not responded to requests for comment on the lawsuit. The lawsuit claims that Instacart and Partiful knowingly launched the new app with the identical name, targeting the same Gen Z demographic and creating a likelihood of confusion among customers.

Allegations of Misappropriation of Goodwill

Fizz accuses Instacart and Partiful of attempting to misappropriate the goodwill it has developed among the Gen Z demographic. The lawsuit states that Instacart and Partiful could have chosen any name for their new venture but instead opted to use "FIZZ," competing directly with Fizz in its core market of event planning for Gen Z.

Exploitation of Brand Recognition

Fizz also alleges that Instacart and Partiful are exploiting its brand recognition as a known social platform for Gen Z. The lawsuit claims that Instacart had a bad faith intent to profit from the "FIZZ" marks when it registered the domain name , diverting consumers from Fizz’s online location to the Fizz App’s online location for commercial gain.

History of Legal Action

This lawsuit is not Fizz’s first experience with legal action. In 2023, the startup sued rival Sidechat over unfair competition practices. The current lawsuit announces Fizz’s determination to protect its trademark and brand identity in the face of what it perceives as unfair competition.

Call to Action

For more information on startup legal battles and the latest in tech news, consider attending relevant tech events, such as those hosted by TechCrunch. An upcoming event in Berkeley, CA, on June 5, offers insights into the tech industry and provides a platform for networking and learning about the latest developments.

Conclusion

The lawsuit between Fizz, Instacart, and Partiful highlights the importance of trademark protection and the competitive landscape of social media and event planning apps targeting the Gen Z demographic. As the case unfolds, it will be interesting to see how the court rules on the allegations of trademark infringement and the implications this might have for startup naming conventions and brand identity protection.


Source Link